You might have seen bits of this already, but since the article offers such a nice brief summary, I might as well post it here. Those who don’t want to pay to read Frank Rich’s article need look no further than here - always helps to know the full story. What I find most interesting in all of this is that this is such a prime example for how photographs (in general?) do not have a meaning by themselves, and often you see what you are able to see or even what you want to see.